In a world grappling with climate change, engaging citizens in climate adaptation is crucial. This article explores innovative methods implemented in the AGORA project to facilitate collaboration between citizens, researchers and decision-makers.
Collaborative efforts between citizens, decision-makers and researchers can significantly impact climate adaptation research and decision-making. Research shows that co-exploration, co-production and transdisciplinary methods produce more relevant insights, which in turn influences decision-making more effectively1.
There is an increasing call for innovative, collaborative approaches to engage citizens in climate adaptation and resilience projects, both within Europe and globally. Various methods and frameworks have been proposed to support citizen engagement. But which methods truly work?
Here, we explore engagement techniques for climate adaptation and resilience explored within the AGORA project. If you would like to contribute information on citizen engagement processes or provide feedback to AGORA on these methods, consider attending our session at Adaptation Futures 2023 titled “Good practice community and citizen engagement for accelerating a climate resilient future in Europe and beyond” or participate in our online survey.
The Tandem framework2 seeks to enhance interactions between participants, including citizens, in both decision-making and research processes. Inspired by the principle of a tandem bicycle, this framework underscores the importance of collaboration. Just as two bikers must synchronize their efforts to move forward, participants must communicate and adjust their individual approaches for productive collaboration.
The Tandem framework has been effectively employed in various projects and decision-making processes, from co-designing climate services for agriculture in Nigeria3, co-designing climate services to support adaptation to natural hazards in Sweden4, co-designing climate services for water planning in Colombia5 to aiding collaborative climate change solutions in Lusaka, Zambia6. Tandem has also been integrated into SEI’s research on European climate risk assessments7.
The Delphi method employs a series of surveys interspersed with controlled feedback to gather information and build consensus without the need for face-to-face meetings8. With the anonymity of participants ensured, the aggregated group opinion is fed back to participants for further reflection.
There are six main phases for using the Delphi method9: (i) setting up the Delphi process – including selecting respondents and generating a requisite number of focal issues, (ii) software/delivery choice, (iii) developing question items and response scales, (iv) providing feedback between a requisite number of Delphi rounds, (v) preventing and dealing with panellist drop out, and (vi) analysing and presenting the Delphi yield9.
The method has been successfully applied in various scenarios, such as scenario analysis of football teams during the COVID-19 pandemic11, or exploring the best ways to deliver education services12.
Both the Tandem and Delphi methods are being considered, adapted and used throughout the AGORA project. Their primary goal is to pinpoint best practices for citizen engagement methodologies, create evaluation frameworks and co-design an online platform for knowledge exchange and networking.
SEI and the AGORA Project will host the session “Good practice community and citizen engagement for accelerating a climate resilient future in Europe and beyond” at Adaptation Futures 2023. The session aims to foster peer learning about citizen and stakeholder engagement in adaptation planning and action.
If you are attending Adaptation Futures 2023 in person, please join our session #393 in room 524C, at 16:00 (EDT) on 4 October to continue these discussions.
Alternatively, we welcome you to share your insights through our online survey.
Head of Knowledge Management, Senior Research Fellow
Global Operations
SEI Headquarters
Team Leader: Cities, Communities and Consumption; Senior Research Fellow
SEI Headquarters
Past event / Join SEI experts at Adaptation Futures as they share insights on transboundary climate risks, supply chain resilience and justice in climate adaptation.
Bremer, S., & Meisch, S. (2017). Co-production in climate change research: Reviewing different perspectives. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(6), 1–22. edswsc. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.482
Daniels, E., Bharwani, S., & Butterfield, R. (2019). The Tandem framework: A holistic approach to co-designing climate services.
Butterfield, R., & Osano, P. (2020). Improving the co-production of climate services for agriculture: A case study from Nigeria.
André, K., Järnberg, L., & Gerger Swartling, Å. (2020). Co-designing climate services to support adaptation to natural hazards in two Swedish municipalities [SEI Discussion Brief]. Stockholm Environment Institute.
Santos Santos, T., & Gerger Swartling, Å. (2020). Co-designing climate services for water planning: A case study from the Campoalegre River Basin in Colombia (SEI Discussion Brief) [SEI Brief]. Stockholm Environment Institute.
Daniels, E., Bharwani, S., & Mwalukanga, B. (2019). Exploring the power of collaboration to address climate change in urban Africa. SEI. https://www.sei.org/perspectives/exploring-the-power-of-collaboration-to-address-climate-change-in-urban-africa/
André, K., Gerger Swartling, Å., Englund, M., Petutschnig, L., Nyadzi, E. M. N. A. N., Milde, K., Lückerath, D., Cauchy, A., Botnen Holm, T., Hanssen Korsbrekke, M., Bour, M., & Rome, E. (2023). Improving stakeholder engagement in climate change risk assessments: Insights from six case studies in Europe. Frontiers in Climate, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2023.1120421
Geist, M. R. (2010). Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: A comparison of two studies. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.006
Belton, I., MacDonald, A., Wright, G., & Hamlin, I. (2019). Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.002
Belton, I., MacDonald, A., Wright, G., & Hamlin, I. (2019). Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.002
Design and development by Soapbox.