Skip navigation
Journal article

Improving stakeholder engagement in climate change risk assessments: insights from six co-production initiatives in Europe

While climate adaptation efforts are rolling out across the globe, so far most actions toward adaptation prompt research and planning rather than solutions and implementation. Despite considerable scientific advancements, conventional research falls short in supporting adaptation processes as it rarely offers usable and actionable information for societal actors and is thus not effective in terms of achieving impact on policy and practice.

Karin André, Åsa Gerger Swartling, Mathilda Englund / Published on 15 June 2023

Read the paper  Open access

Citation

André, K., Gerger Swartling, Å., Englund, M., Petutschnig, L., Attoh, E. M. N. A. N., Milde, K., Lückerath, D., Cauchy, A., Botnen Holm, T., Hanssen Korsbrekke, M., Bour, M., & Rome, E. (2023). Improving stakeholder engagement in climate change risk assessments: insights from six co-production initiatives in Europe. Frontiers in Climate, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2023.1120421

It is increasingly recognized that effective climate risk assessments benefit from well-crafted processes of knowledge co-production involving key stakeholders and scientists. To support the co-production of actionable knowledge on climate change, a careful design and planning process is often called for to ensure that relevant perspectives are integrated and to promote shared understandings and joint ownership of the research process.

In this article, the authors aim to further refine methods for co-producing climate services to support risk-informed decision-support and adaptation action. By drawing on insights and lessons learned from participatory processes in six case studies in Northern and Central Europe, they seek to better understand how associated challenges and opportunities arising in co-production processes play out in different case-specific contexts.

All cases have applied a standardized framework for climate vulnerability and risk assessment, the impact chain method. The analysis builds on multiple methods including a survey among case study researchers and stakeholders, interviews with researchers, as well as a project workshop to develop collective insights and synthesize results.

The results illustrate case studies’ different approaches to stakeholder involvement as well as the outputs, outcomes, and impacts resulting from the risk assessments. Examples include early indications of mutual learning and improved understanding of climate risks, impacts and vulnerability, and local and regional decision contexts, as well as actual uptake in planning and decision contexts. Other outcomes concern scientific progress and contribution to methodological innovations.

Overall, this study offers insights into the value of adopting good practices in knowledge co-production in impact chain-based climate risk assessments, with wider lessons for the climate services domain. While collaborations and interactions have contributed to a number of benefits some practical challenges remain for achieving effective co-production processes in the context of climate change and adaptation. To overcome these challenges, the authors propose a carefully designed but flexible and iterative participatory approach that enables joint learning; reassessment of stakeholder needs and capacities; and co-produced, actionable climate services with the potential to catalyze climate action.

Read the paper

Open access

SEI authors

Karin André
Karin André

Team Leader: Cities, Communities and Consumption; Senior Research Fellow

SEI Headquarters

Åsa Gerger Swartling
Åsa Gerger Swartling

Head of Knowledge Management, Senior Research Fellow

Global Operations

SEI Headquarters

Mathilda Englund
Mathilda Englund

Research Associate

SEI Headquarters

Read the paper
Frontiers in Climate Open access
Topics and subtopics
Climate : Climate services
Related centres
SEI Headquarters
Regions
Europe

Design and development by Soapbox.